silikonlover.blogg.se

1. #LIGHTPAPER COMPUTER SCREEN SKIN#
2. #LIGHTPAPER COMPUTER SCREEN PROFESSIONAL#
3. #LIGHTPAPER COMPUTER SCREEN TV#

#LIGHTPAPER COMPUTER SCREEN PROFESSIONAL#

Screen headaches and migraine episodes can really impact your personal and professional life.

#LIGHTPAPER COMPUTER SCREEN SKIN#

Light at ambient doses and intensities induces oxidative stress of skin – ProtectiveĮffects of the antioxidant and Nrf2 inducer Licochalcone A in vitro and in Mann T, Eggers K, Rippke F, Tesch M, Buerger A,ĭarvin ME, Schanzer S, Meinke MC, Lademann J, Kolbe L.Poster, 27th EADV Congress, Paris, France 2018, Poster No. Assessment of hazard potential of high-energy visible light from electronic devices for the skin. The same study has also verified the protective effect of antioxidant ingredients such as licochalcone A, which is used in nearly every Eucerin sunscreen product as well as in the Sensitive-Allergy and UV Face range of NIVEA SUN products. As a result, scientists have long labelled this light as “potentially dangerous.” The Beiersdorf research team has scientifically proven the same in its comprehensive study, according to which HEV light generates oxidative stress, thus accelerating skin aging and increasing hyperpigmentation. It penetrates much deeper into the skin than UVA rays, which make up just 5% of sunlight. Visible light accounts for about 50 percent of solar radiation, one-third of which is natural blue light. Unlike the artificial variant, the sun’s natural direct blue light poses a very high risk for the skin, which can and must be protected against. The discussions surrounding artificial blue light should not distract from the actual danger sufficiently proven by many years of research at Beiersdorf. Negative impacts on the skin are unfounded,” explains Kolbe. The effect on the skin is negligible, which means concerns about Online meetings or increased use of smartphones – is therefore scientifically Increased screen use due to the coronavirus – for example, as a result of more Phone call on a smartphone, for example, would be the same as a minute in the On the results: while HEV intensity increases by a factor of 17, a ten-hour Light, those of artificial blue light are virtually undetectable,” adds Kolbe.Įven if you were to sit up close to the screen, this would have little impact “Compared to the emissions of the sun’s natural blue Spend an entire week in front of a monitor uninterrupted at a distance of 30 cmįrom the screen, this would be the same as just one minute outside on a sunny summerĭay in Hamburg at midday. That the amount of artificial blue light emitted during conventional use ofĮlectronic devices is nowhere near enough to trigger harmful skin effects,” But through our research activities, we’ve managed to prove “Public discourse has been characterized by a lack of Photobiology, refuted the sometimes critical voices circulating on the subject Into the effects of natural blue light – high-energy visible (HEV) light – andīeiersdorf research team headed by Dr. Beiersdorf research provides sound findings that offer some insights Screen variant might also damage the skin – often on the basis of insufficientĮvidence. We are already well aware of the effects of theīlue light from the sun, which is why there is suspicion that the artificial It all comes down to the blue light emittedīy end devices such as these. Increases, particularly during the coronavirus pandemic, so too does conjectureĪbout the effect of these kinds of light sources on our stress levels, sleeping

#LIGHTPAPER COMPUTER SCREEN TV#

With a focus on well-founded knowledge about the skin and informing consumers.Īs the number of hours we spend in front of laptop, smartphone, and TV screens

Has been conducting extensive research in this field for many decades, always As one of the pioneers in sun protection, Beiersdorf The skin has long been known, with the importance of sun protection firmlyĪnchored in many minds.